^ "Frequently Asked Questions about the GNU Licenses – Is GPLv3 compatible with GPLv2?".
#Librecad vs qcad software
The programs have dependencies on the popular GPLv2 license while the Free Software Foundation will only let LibreDWG be licensed for GPLv3 use, not GPLv2. Both LibreCAD and FreeCAD both want to use LibreDWG and have patches available for supporting the DWG file format library, but can't integrate them. "FSF Wastes Away Another "High Priority" Project". My advice for LibreDWG: if you make a library, choosing a widely compatible license (MIT, BSD, or LGPL) is a very positive choice." For the time being we stick to that, moving to GPL 3 has no evident benefits I know of. It's fine for applications, because it doesn't hurt at this point, but, in my opinion, not for libraries that are designed to be used as freely as possible." "Blender is also still "GPLv2 or later". I don't like dogmatic ideologies, and freeing software by force (as GPL/GNU does) is something I dislike in particular. It prohibits its use in Assimp and for many other applications as well. "Personally, I'm extremely unhappy with their GPL licensing. Archived from the original on 9 November 2016. "What's up with DWG adoption in free software?". ^ Prokoudine, Alexandre (26 January 2012).Archived from the original on 20 November 2012. ^ "Review about Linux LibreCAD and Linux Inkscape"."DIY: LibreCAD offers basic CAD tools for free".
"6 Tips To Get The Most Out of LibreCAD Free CAD Software".